Exemptions from Registration: The De Minimis Exemption and Institutional Clients
An Investment Adviser (IA) based in State A exclusively conducts its business from its sole office in State A. The IA provides advisory services to three individual retail clients who are residents of State B and also manages portfolios for four large university endowments located in State B. The IA has no physical office, employees, or other regular presence within State B. Under the Uniform Securities Act (USA), regarding its operations in State B, the IA is most likely:
A.Exempt from registration in State B because it has no place of business there and serves fewer than six non-institutional clients.
B.Required to register in State B due to providing services to both institutional and individual retail clients within the state.
C.Exempt from registration in State B because its total client count, combining institutional and non-institutional clients, is less than six.
D.Required to register in State B as providing services to more than two individual retail clients indicates it is transacting business in the state.
Rationale:
Under the Uniform Securities Act (USA), an Investment Adviser (IA) is exempt from registration in a state if it has no place of business in that state AND its only clients are institutional clients, OR if it directs offers or communications to no more than five non-institutional clients in that state during any period of 12 consecutive months. In this scenario, the IA has no place of business in State B and serves three individual retail (non-institutional) clients, which is fewer than six. The four university endowments are institutional clients and do not count towards the 'fewer than six' non-institutional client threshold for the de minimis exemption.
Regarding the requirement to register due to providing services to both institutional and individual retail clients, this is incorrect because the presence of institutional clients does not automatically negate the de minimis exemption for non-institutional clients under the USA, provided the conditions are met. The exemption specifically allows for an IA with no place of business to serve both types of clients, with the non-institutional client count being the critical factor.
The claim that the IA is exempt because its total client count, combining institutional and non-institutional clients, is less than six, is incorrect. The de minimis exemption for IAs under the USA specifically pertains to the number of *non-institutional* clients. Institutional clients are not counted towards this numerical threshold; an IA can serve an unlimited number of institutional clients without triggering registration, as long as it has no place of business in the state.
Finally, the assertion that the IA is required to register as providing services to more than two individual retail clients indicates it is transacting business, is incorrect. While providing services to clients certainly constitutes transacting business, the USA provides specific exemptions. The critical factor for the de minimis exemption for IAs is having no place of business in the state and serving five or fewer non-institutional clients, not merely 'more than two.' This distractor attempts to confuse the conditions for registration with a misinterpretation of the de minimis threshold and the definition of a 'place of business.'
100% Free
Free FINRA Series 63 Questions + Study Tips
Join FINRA Series 63 candidates receiving practice questions and expert exam-day strategies directly to their inbox.
